A Fourth Jab? UPDATE
Seriously?
Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla
“We know that the duration of the [vaccine] protection doesn’t last very long,” Bourla added. “If you get sick, you can get sick again next year. … Right now, the way that we have seen, it is necessary—a fourth booster right now.” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
FDA Commissioner, Robert M. Califf
CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky
“We are following those data; we’re also working within the FDA, and with our pharmaceutical partners, of course, to understand the benefit of that vaccine—that fourth shot—the timing of it and in whom it should be recommended in the weeks and months ahead,” Walensky said.
Bourla’s statement is bolstered by absolutely no data on the efficacy of a fourth injection. None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Neither are the positions of CDC or FDA.
“Where are the randomized trials powered to show an effect on severe disease and death?” Dr. Ramin Farzaneh-Far, a cardiologist, wrote on Twitter.
IF Rochelle Walensky were actually following the data she would do two things. First, she would release ALL of it and acknowledge that we’re not too dumb to understand it. After all it really is our data; not hers. Walensky is just the hired help who is responsible only for its collection and dissemination. Second, she would be well advised to stop playing Three Card Monte with that data and her “guidelines”.
Bourla, Walensky, and the FDA have several things in common, first and foremost they all ignore natural immunity. Second, they have conspired to prevent the use of Ivermectin to treat early SARS-CoV-2 infections. This is just one study of FIVE returned on the first page of a search for “ivermectin covid mortality” (DuckDuckGo). EACH of those studies found that Ivermectin resulted in substantial decreases in mortality FROM COVID-19. Those five studies are just the tip of the iceberg.
So lets take a look at what the CDC has to say about hospitalizations between the vaxxed and the “unvaxxed” but first a caveat. Because Walensky has tampered with the hospitalization data and has constantly changed the definition of “fully vaccinated” there is no way of knowing what the true numbers of people in each group are but for the sake of argument I will take her numbers as being the absolute truth (insert eye roll). The table below was constructed from the data on the page linked below using the data from the day of maximum hospitalization for each age group. CDC presents the data as the number per 100,000 population. I don’t.
Here is the CDC data followed by my calculations— feel free to verify the age stratified risks and my math.
Y’all tell me why Walensky et al are selling their argument per 100,000 population. My guess is that when they present the data as a percentage of population you can see that the odds of staying out of the hospital ON THE WORST DAY — REGARDLESS of inoculation status are substantially greater than 99.8% if you are under the age of 49 and well under 99.4% regardless of your vaccination status if you are older than 49. Even for those over the age of 65 the risk of hospitalization is is a mere 0.48% that’s not even 0.005 people in 100.
Had I been developing a Recommend Exposure Limit for workplace exposure to a carcinogen which is what I did for a number of years, where the standard is 1 excess cancer per million exposed workers, this data would have great significance. But here is the difference. Apart from the fact that the data is unreliable —- there are multiple treatments available that obviate the necessity for a “vaccination”. In the workplace that excess cancer can be eliminated either by engineering controls and personal protective equipment OR removing the carcinogen from the workplace. In the general population disease can most often be prevented from causing hospitalization or death IF a treatment is available.
In this case there is not just one treatment — there are multiple treatments that have been studied and found to be effective in treating OR PREVENTING SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19.
Until each person stands up and screams NO MORE this madness will continue.
AND NOW THERE IS THIS:
Protection From Second Booster Quickly Wanes: Israeli Study
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/protection-from-second-booster-quickly-wanes-israeli-study_4361770.html
Union, KY
20 March 2022