ADD ONE MORE ADVERSE EVENT "...not considered adverse...."
How Much Longer Will It Be Before We All Just Say "No"?
Judicial Watch after filing yet another FOIA demand for data, has obtained a report from Moderna which shows that:
"…mRNA-1273 [Moderna vaccine]-related variations in skeletal examination included statistically significant increases in the number of F1 rats with 1 or more wavy ribs and 1 or more rib nodules. Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses and 4 litters with a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%. Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses."
There are two ways that this can happen. The first is that the mRNA vaccine is passed from the pregnant mother to the fetus where it exerts a “toxic effect” which leads to skeletal malformations.
The second method is the creation of a heritable mutation in the mother before pregnancy and which is passed on to the offspring. An heritable mutation occurs when the mRNA is inserted into the mothers DNA causing a mutated gene to form which then is passed on to subsequent offspring. A group in Sweden has demonstrated that this possible for the mRNA “vaccine”.
Putting on my Public Health Hat again, this is what this newly discovered data means.
Regardless of HOW these malformations were created - either by direct toxicity through the placenta to the offspring after conception OR by the creation of a heritable genetic mutation matters little the changes are there and they are statistically significant in number.
The prevalence of skeletal malformation alone should serve as a warning. But apparently Moderna doesn’t see it that way and reported these findings as: “not considered adverse”.
But as a Public Health Officer how would I have dealt with this data in constructing a recommendation for human exposure to the Moderna mRNA vaccine?
First, a rat is not a human, differing both physiologically and biochemically from humans. An adult rat capable of reproduction, is not the same as an human female of reproductive age. On a practical level this means that it is exceedingly difficult to translate rat data into anticipated human outcomes but it can serve as a warning.
This has implications for a government policy that attempts to force the inoculation of the nation’s children and for women of childbearing age who now we know are experiencing a unknown number of miscarriages, an out come potentially indicative of a feto-toxic response. Why did I bring up children? Because if what modern is seeing is simple case of toxicity it is quite possible that it is causing toxic effects in the developing skeletal system of children. It is a question that needs to be answered and a piece of information that should give cause for pause when deciding whether to inoculate a child.
While that is a bit of an aside, the real Public Health alarm bells ring in my head when I view this graph. Why? Because it shows that roughly 25% of miscarriages reported to VAERS occurred within 24 hours of receiving the inoculation.
Putting my public health hat on again, we now have two sources of data suggesting fetotoxicity: one from pregnant rats and one from pregnant women. One results in skeletal malformations and one in fetal death. My obligation as a public health official is to error on the side of “prudent public health practice”. If I were a pregnant woman I would delay inoculation with mRNA COVID-19 material until more information is developed by either Moderna or other independent investigators to develop more information on these to “adverse effects”.
Union, Kentucky
14 December 2022