IF you doubted that the Mar-a-Lago raid was purely political that doubt should now be gone.
“ I was very surprised,” Dershowitz said after reading the text of Wall’s letter. “The current president should not be able to waive the executive privilege of a predecessor, without the consent of the former president. Otherwise it (privilege) means nothing. What president will ever discuss anything in private if he knows the man who beat him can and will disclose it.”
While some courts have upheld the notion of a successor president waiving privilege for a predecessor, Dershowitz said the matter remains to be decided definitively by the U.S. Supreme Court.
'The best thinking is that an incumbent president cannot waive the right of the previous president. It would make a mockery of the whole notion of privilege,” he said in a phone interview with Just the News.
He did exactly what he accused 45 of doing … they always project .. that’s what evil people do.
Nixon was a sitting President whose Executive Privilege was denied.
I thought Executive Privilege was limited to a Presidents private communications. Clearly all those documents/materials weren't private communications
Whatever happened to the Epstein videos?. Maybe not , but there must be something in those documents/materials that could be damaging if released or be blackmail material.
Unfortunately we will never know