Yesterday, I briefly commented on CDC’s new guidance regarding the management of the COVID-19 “pandemic”. I called it a sham and it is. Today I want to share a few thoughts on the CDC press release: CDC streamlines COVID-19 guidance to help the public better protect themselves and understand the risk. (emphasis added)
While CDC may call this just a press release it is really a statement of policy. We know what the old policy was and how it failed the American People so what does this new policy offer to reverse that failure? Unfortunately it is simply more of the same.
Here are the stated goals of the new policy:
Help people better understand their risk.(emphasis added)
Protect themselves and others.
Actions to take if exposed to COVID-19.
Actions to take if you are sick or test positive.
I’ve emphasized the word “understand” because it conveys CDC’s true feelings about this whole sordid mess: ‘You just don’t understand and it must be because we failed to communicate clearly.’ In other words, the material that CDC presented was over your heads.
Yes, CDC has grudgingly and back-handedly acknowledged that acquired immunity e.g. natural immunity, is real and that it “contributed” to the substantial decrease in cases. AND they also demurred to the folly of six feet of separation and locking the Nation down — maybe.
But here is the bottom line. CDC has doubled down on the things that matter — inoculation with the mRNA experimental preparation and the use of masks (albeit “high quality”) to prevent the spread of COVID-19. AND they acknowledge that treatments work — as long as those treatments are those that they approve of; like Paxlovid, the drug that caused reinfection in Tony Fauci and Joe Biden and millions of others.
About that mRNA stuff. The world’s honest scientific community has known almost since its inception that the mRNA inoculant’s spike protein persists in our bodies and is not short lived as CDC once asserted; an assertion which has quietly been removed. Here is how the Epoch Times has reported this: “
”The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stealthily edited a webpage it maintains that lists details about messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines.
The page, titled “Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines,” says it was last updated on July 15. But archived versions of the page show that key portions were removed on July 22 or July 23.
The version captured on July 22 includes the claim, “The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body.”
“Our cells break down mRNA from these vaccines and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination,” it says. “Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”
The following day, the claims were gone.”(original links have been maintained)
What does this mean? It’s simple. It means that the CDC knows quite well that the spike protein from the COVID-19 mRNA inoculant stays in the recipients body for much longer than a few weeks where as the burgeoning body of scientific literature is reporting, it is wrecking havoc — causing long term serious adverse effects and sudden death.
Despite this knowledge CDC is still insisting that “vaccination” with the mRNA inoculant is necessary to stem the spread of COVID-19.
Ask yourselves this question: How does CDC’s failure to acknowledge the inherent risk of the mRNA spike protein help you to better understand your risk and how to protect yourself and others?
And this question: If CDC were truly concerned about your well being why are they not launching an all hands investigation of the reports in VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System built and maintained both the CDC and the FDA?
More About Prevention
Greta Massetti, CDC epidemiologist who’s specialty appears to be injury prevention is quoted in the CDC Press release as follows: “We also have a better understanding of how to protect people from being exposed too the virus, like wearing high-quality masks, testing, and improved ventilation.”
First things first. The concept of a “high quality mask” is a work of fiction. A mask is not a respiratory protective device capable of stopping the spread of any virus particle. If one reads Massetti’s MMWR article when she refers to high quality masks she means the N-95 respirator and as I explained to Dr. Massetti she has an obligation to clearly explain that the N-95 respirator is governed by federal law at 29CFR10910.134 and that it is not intended to prevent individual virus particles from either entering or exiting your respiratory system. You can read Dr. Massetti’s response to me which is essentially, ‘So what?’.
Further more, the N-95 is no more suited to stopping individual virus particles than the surgical mask. The wearing of any respiratory barrier (mask or respirator) is only effective if worn by a symptomatic individual who is actively coughing or sneezing. AND as we all know if you are sick with a fever, a cough, and sneezing you should not be out in public.
CDC also knows this which brings me to the remaining semi-serious “guidance” measures from CDC which collectively can be referred to as the ‘Mommy Rules’. In brief, the ‘Mommy Rules’ go like this:
IF you have a fever and other symptoms stay home and away from others except your “mommy” whose hand is a thermometer and who has an immune system second to none.
One last point (for now) CDC’s press release contains this self-congratulatory statement of risk and risk reduction:
”COVID-19 continues to circulate globally, however, with so many tools available to us for reducing COVID-19 severity there, is significantly less risk of severe illness, hospitalizations and health compared to earlier in the pandemic.”
This is one of the most incredibly self-serving and inaccurate policy statements CDC has yet to make. Why is it inaccurate? Because they don’t mean that you can go to your local pharmacy and buy Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatments well known around the globe to work BUT they do mean that you can have anything that Pfizer makes that they and NIH reap a financial benefit from — AND that don’t work.
The mRNA inoculant doesn’t prevent transmission but it does cause inflammatory heart disease, sudden death, reproductive problems in women, and neurologic damage in children. Pfizer’s Paxlovid causes reinfection, and Remdesivir causes chronic kidney damage. Nevertheless, CDC is taking a victory lap shouting “We saved world!” at every turn. In point of fact CDC’s efforts were painfully inadequate and wrong. The virus, SARS-CoV-2 did what viruses always do - it mutated and when it did it became more infectious but caused far less severe illness.
CDC has conceded nothing.
But they have taken credit for God’s hand.
And if you think that a hard fought victory has been won — think again because CDC isn’t finished. Here is the agency’s bottom line:
”This updated guidance is intended to apply to community settings. In the coming weeks CDC will work to align stand-alone guidance documents, such as those for healthcare settings, congregate settings at higher risk of transmission, and travel, with today’s update.”
The larger question is how will CDC handle future “pandemics”. It won't . Future “pandemics” will be handled for them by a newly created operational division within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that will be responsible for consolidation and management of future pandemics.
”The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced that Secretary Xavier Becerra has elevated the existing Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) from a staff division to an operating division, taking on the new name of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR).
The move elevates ASPR to a standalone agency within the Department alongside other HHS agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), among others. This change will allow ASPR to mobilize a coordinated national response more effectively and efficiently during future disasters and emergencies in close collaboration with its sister agencies.
While the change in name and organizational status are effective immediately, the transition will be phased in over the next one to two years, and, when complete, will provide ASPR with greater administrative capabilities to help it execute its work more effectively.”(emphasis added)
Nothing good will come from an expanded government particularly when the expansion creates a new agency for the sole purpose power consolidation.
Union, KY
19 August 2022