For Every Dose There is a Response

A tale of Paracelsus, Alice, and Pfizer

"In all things there is a poison, and there is nothing without a poison. It depends only upon the dose whether a poison is poison or not..." — Paracelsus

As a toxicologist, Paracelsus has always held a place of importance in my analysis of things potentially toxic. One of the first things that I always looked for was a dose-response. Another way of speaking about dose-response is this: “If some is good, more is better.” Then of course there is Alice:

“When Alice finds that she can't fit through the little door to get into the beautiful garden because she is too big, she noticed that a glass bottle with a paper label that says "DRINK ME" tied around it has magically appeared on the table. Alice wonders if it is safe to drink or not, as she thinks to herself, "If one drinks much from a bottle marked 'Poison,' it is certain to disagree with one, sooner or later."

Which brings us to Pfizer and its announcement of the availability of the SARS-CoV-2 “vaccine”.

”Study enrolled 43,538 participants, with 42% having diverse backgrounds, and no serious safety concerns have been observed; Safety and additional efficacy data continue to be collected.”

But as Alice observed her bottle with a proper label also said nothing about an adverse event.

Which brings me to two graphs from the OpenVaers Project.

The graph on the right shows the total number of reports of Myo/pericarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) to the FDA/CDC Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS) for each year since it began in 2009. VAERS is sole purpose is to serve as a warning system to alert public health officials to a potential relationship between a vaccine and an “Adverse Event”. This not a demonstration of causality but it is a warning.

The graph on the left shows us what both Paracelsus and Alice understood— the poison is in the dose. The graph labeled “All Myo/Pericarditis Reported to VAERS Post COVID Vaccine by Dose” clearly demonstrates that the number of reports of Myocarditis/Pericarditis increased AFTER the second dose. In other words, this appears to show a vaccine dose related increase in Myocarditis/Pericarditis.

Why is dose response important? It is is important because it lends credibility to claim that a substance is causing a toxic response. In this case it is a “vaccine” and the response is inflammatory heart disease.

The graph on the right represents 24,202 reports of Myo/Pericarditis as of January 2021. Most of those cases occurred among people between the ages of 14 and 24.

So far the FDA/CDC investigation of these reports has been insignificant. Despite a clear dose response those two agencies still insist that the “vaccine” is “safe”.

One more word.

In a previous article I explained how the data is VAERS represents only a small portion of the true number of actual Adverse Events. This under reporting is well known to both the FDA and CDC. The range of under reporting somewhere between about 3% and 100%. This means that the true number of reports vaccine related cases could be anywhere between 750,000 and 2,420,200 mostly young men.

The cavalier attitude shown by FDA/CDC that these reports of Myo/Pericarditis are few in number and mostly mild is sinful. While they have noted that Myo/Pericarditis may occur their continuation of the vaccine program is a clear message that they don’t care whether your child or loved one or you develop a potential severe disease from a vaccine that they insist is safe.

That we should accept the potential for permanent damage to the hearts of our children and young men and women is an unconscionable crass position that should never be tolerated by those of us paying the salaries of the men and women whom we pay to protect us from disease and toxic damage from drugs and vaccines.

Union, KY
11 Feb 2022