Larry you may have seen the HART video already, but this 4 min clip is particularly good at summarizing the current fraud of the day by the Agencies, particularly damning...You cant make this shit up.
Thank you so much. Thought 1: Pfizer has a history of unblinding during its mRNA trials. Thought 2: Dr. Hart’s comments fit hand in glove with my cursory view of the data.
But then, between the Walgreen’s data and the CDC data, there really isn’t much need for a deep dive in order to arrive at the conclusion that we’re being deceived.
Yes. I went to a local monthly surgical society talk by Kathy Neuzel MD about two mos ago. She is head of U MD virology. Connected to GAVI and Lewis Chair at U MD(bioweapons guy). 30min and not one word re safety She was dismissive about only A short 2 mos trial before unblinding -noting “we were in Such a hurry - there was a pandemic!” Nb :( when surgeons get in a hurry there are some serious complications but never mind). She claimed They were “ethically bound” to offer their unblinded ctrl group this wonderful 95%Effective vaccine” . She of course never was privy to pfizer proprietary raw data. When I pointedly noted in QA after Talk that she had zero safety info in her presentation she claimed that she didnt have time for that , but it was “ always all about safety”. Sure- 2 months of data for what typically would be A minimum 5 yrs of accumulated data. The group of appx 100 surgeons wound up giving her a standing ovation for “ saving millions of lives” giving new meaning to the term groupthink. There was no answer to additional prodding re hong kong and other sources of myocarditis demonstrating 1/2700 occurrence in 16-24 yos. And so on. A real eye opener on how propaganda Works in real time
These people shouldn’t be able to look themselves in the mirror but some how they manage to put their makeup on without looking like the clowns they are.
I would never have gotten away with using this kind of data to support a new exposure limit.
It is that world --- for now. We have to stop sitting on the sidelines, become engaged, and take it back. I don't know what that looks like but most assuredly hope that it can be done firmly but not violently.
Larry you may have seen the HART video already, but this 4 min clip is particularly good at summarizing the current fraud of the day by the Agencies, particularly damning...You cant make this shit up.
https://rumble.com/v18s66i-bombshell-dr.-clare-craig-exposes-how-pfizer-twisted-their-clinical-trial-d.html
Thank you so much. Thought 1: Pfizer has a history of unblinding during its mRNA trials. Thought 2: Dr. Hart’s comments fit hand in glove with my cursory view of the data.
But then, between the Walgreen’s data and the CDC data, there really isn’t much need for a deep dive in order to arrive at the conclusion that we’re being deceived.
Yes. I went to a local monthly surgical society talk by Kathy Neuzel MD about two mos ago. She is head of U MD virology. Connected to GAVI and Lewis Chair at U MD(bioweapons guy). 30min and not one word re safety She was dismissive about only A short 2 mos trial before unblinding -noting “we were in Such a hurry - there was a pandemic!” Nb :( when surgeons get in a hurry there are some serious complications but never mind). She claimed They were “ethically bound” to offer their unblinded ctrl group this wonderful 95%Effective vaccine” . She of course never was privy to pfizer proprietary raw data. When I pointedly noted in QA after Talk that she had zero safety info in her presentation she claimed that she didnt have time for that , but it was “ always all about safety”. Sure- 2 months of data for what typically would be A minimum 5 yrs of accumulated data. The group of appx 100 surgeons wound up giving her a standing ovation for “ saving millions of lives” giving new meaning to the term groupthink. There was no answer to additional prodding re hong kong and other sources of myocarditis demonstrating 1/2700 occurrence in 16-24 yos. And so on. A real eye opener on how propaganda Works in real time
These people shouldn’t be able to look themselves in the mirror but some how they manage to put their makeup on without looking like the clowns they are.
I would never have gotten away with using this kind of data to support a new exposure limit.
It is that world --- for now. We have to stop sitting on the sidelines, become engaged, and take it back. I don't know what that looks like but most assuredly hope that it can be done firmly but not violently.