DOSE RESPONSE IN MYO/PERICARDITIS VAERS REPORTS AMONG THE VULNERABLE
What We Have Allowed To Happen To The Millenials and Gen Z
My pretty picture:
I suppose that there is an App for that but just like landscape design I get a better “feel” for what’s happening if I’m forced to linger over the data with a piece of paper and a pen or pencil (only clarity counts, ’cuz I said so).
VAERS allows us to parse the data on Myo/Pericarditis by dose; all you have to do is click on a label associated with the color representing a specific dose and Shazam! you too with a little addition, can produce this same graph.
I first wrote about the dose-response for Mayo/Pericarditis almost two years ago on 11 February 2022 in an article titled: For Every Dose There is a Response where I presented this graph from VAERS. It demonstrates three things. First, more people between 16 and 35 (an arbitrary range that can be easily changed at your will) reported Myo/Pericarditits following a second dose of the mRNA inoculant than after the first dose which demonstrates a clear dose response. Second, the age at which Myo/pericarditis was most reported shifted to the left which means that more people at a younger age were reported to have developed Myo/Pericarditis following the second dose compared to the first dose.
The third point is that the graph on the right makes it clear that even in 2021 the number of reports of Myo/Pericarditis in 2021 was unprecedented compared to any prior year of VAERS reporting. Nevertheless, the federal government demanded, and required that American citizens be inoculated with what was clearly demonstrated by it own data, to be dangerous.
This graph was generated from the most recent VAERS data from OpenVARES.com
It shows that in the intervening three years the pattern hasn’t changed. There are more reports following Dose 2 than were filed following Dose 1 and the age at which the bulk of the Dose 2 reports were filed has shifted to the left. In other words, mRNA inoculant related Myo/Pericarditis was occurring at a younger age following Dose 2 compared to dose 1.
My hand drawn graph confirms the data by showing the totals: 1,899 reports among those between 16 and 35 years of age following Dose 1 and 2,372 reports following Dose 2.
This work of scientific art makes the shift in age of report clear: those who received Dose two and subsequently reported Myo/pericarditis to VARES were about two years younger than those who reported the condition following the first Dose.
So the question is this: Why does the dose-response not continue following doses 3 and 4?
There are two possible reasons. First, the total number of people filing a VAERS report are most likely representatives of a group of a phenotypically vulnerable population e.g. it’s in their genes and as cases were reported for the first time there were fewer left in that group so that the number of reports decreased. Second, the people in this group of those who might be the most vulnerable to the mRNA inoculant wised up after the second dose and just stopped being jabbed again and again and again.
Either possibility can explain the fewer number of reports following Dose 3 and the shift in age (21 years) for the peak number of cases reported to the right because wise parents stopped having their children filled with this poison. As I will explain below the reason matters little.
Public Health Policy Time
When establishing prudent public health policy it is sometimes important to know the exact mechanism for how a response is being elicited. This is not one of those times. Here is what I know for a fact and what I believe should be the result of that knowledge.
Myo/Pericarditis is related to the COVID-19 mRNA inoculant.
The number of reports of Myo/Pericarditis is greater following Dose 2 than for Dose 1.
That there is such large number of reports of Myo/Pericarditis in 2021 compared to all previous years is alarming and unprecedented.
It is well established that the reports VAERS are only 1-3.33% +/- of the total number of actual cases.
ANY of these statement is, in my experience, sufficient reason to remove mRNA COVID-19 inoculants from society and ban their production and use forever.
Those who knew of the danger of the mRNA inoculant but insisted that they be required should be charged with a crime against humanity and tried accordingly.
Every victim should be compensated by those companies that produced and marketed this poison and the federal officials who perpetrated this crime.
Every time I write about this disaster I think that it will be the last time. And every time I think that, I soon discover the folly of my thoughts on this matter. Until we decide to be heard and not accept any response other than: We’re sorry and we will comply with what ever the justice system orders. this madness will continue.
Union, Kentucky
15 January 2024