More likely he is a dutiful toadie who will continue the Democrat policy of charging outrageous amounts for Nuclear Waste storage/disposal while using ridiculous excuses to prevent any commercial hi-level nuclear waste storage to be licensed. While claiming on site dry cask storage is unacceptable. And at the same time killing the highly successful IFR (Intergral Fast Reactor) program that would burn spent nuclear fuel generating $100 trillion in clean energy. At the same time these hypocrites claim "we have a climate change emergency" and meanwhile they happily shutdown perfectly good nuclear power plants, replacing them with gas generation. Why don't they charge gas, coal and wind/solar similar fees for their millionX greater quantity of waste storage/disposal. Waste that actually does kill people, unlike nuclear waste.
More likely he is a dutiful toadie who will continue the Democrat policy of charging outrageous amounts for Nuclear Waste storage/disposal while using ridiculous excuses to prevent any commercial hi-level nuclear waste storage to be licensed. While claiming on site dry cask storage is unacceptable. And at the same time killing the highly successful IFR (Intergral Fast Reactor) program that would burn spent nuclear fuel generating $100 trillion in clean energy. At the same time these hypocrites claim "we have a climate change emergency" and meanwhile they happily shutdown perfectly good nuclear power plants, replacing them with gas generation. Why don't they charge gas, coal and wind/solar similar fees for their millionX greater quantity of waste storage/disposal. Waste that actually does kill people, unlike nuclear waste.